Machine Learning

Machine Learning Experiment Design Prompt

Structure your ML experiments for reliable results and systematic model improvement.

ml experiment research validation modeling

Machine Learning Experiment Design Prompt

Overview

This prompt guides you through designing robust machine learning experiments that produce reliable, reproducible results.

Experiment Framework

1. Problem Definition

  • Business Objective: What problem are you solving?
  • Success Metrics: How will you measure success?
  • Constraints: Time, budget, computational resources
  • Stakeholder Requirements: What outcomes matter most?

2. Data Strategy

  • Data Sources: Where will data come from?
  • Data Quality: Completeness, accuracy, bias assessment
  • Data Splitting: Train/validation/test sets
  • Data Preprocessing: Cleaning, feature engineering, normalization

3. Model Selection

  • Algorithm Choices: Why these specific algorithms?
  • Baseline Models: Simple models for comparison
  • Complexity Trade-offs: Accuracy vs. interpretability vs. speed
  • Ensemble Methods: When and how to combine models

Experimental Design

Controlled Experiments

Control Group: Current system/production model
Treatment Group: New model/proposed changes
Randomization: Ensure fair comparison
Blinding: Remove bias from evaluation

A/B Testing Framework

  • Sample Size Calculation: Statistical power analysis
  • Duration: How long to run the experiment
  • Success Criteria: Pre-defined thresholds
  • Early Stopping: When to conclude the experiment

Validation Strategy

Cross-Validation Techniques

  • K-Fold CV: Standard validation method
  • Stratified CV: Maintain class distribution
  • Time Series CV: For temporal data
  • Nested CV: Hyperparameter tuning + model selection

Performance Metrics

  • Classification: Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-Score, AUC-ROC
  • Regression: MSE, RMSE, MAE, R²
  • Ranking: NDCG, MAP, MRR
  • Custom Metrics: Business-specific KPIs

Statistical Significance

Hypothesis Testing

  • Null Hypothesis: No difference between models
  • Alternative Hypothesis: New model is better
  • P-Value: Probability of observing results by chance
  • Confidence Intervals: Range of likely true effects

Sample Size Considerations

Power = 0.8 (80% chance of detecting real effect)
Alpha = 0.05 (5% false positive rate)
Effect Size = Minimum detectable difference

Reproducibility Checklist

  • Version control for code and data
  • Random seed setting
  • Environment documentation
  • Data lineage tracking
  • Model artifact storage
  • Experiment logging

Common Pitfalls

  • Data Leakage: Training data contaminating test sets
  • Overfitting: Models that don’t generalize
  • Selection Bias: Non-representative samples
  • Confirmation Bias: Seeking results that confirm hypotheses
  • Multiple Testing: Inflated false positive rates

Documentation Template

Experiment Name: [Descriptive name]
Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Hypothesis: [Clear, testable statement]
Methodology: [Detailed experimental setup]
Results: [Quantitative outcomes]
Conclusions: [Business implications]
Next Steps: [Follow-up actions]

Remember, well-designed experiments provide confidence in your results and guide data-driven decision making.

Share this Prompt